logo
logo
Sign in

Conduction a CEO evaluation by the board

avatar
Brody Lukas

The annual CEO evaluation will serve different purposes. As a matter of fact, the CEO must be doing a great job indeed and we are sure he or she is compensated for the performance. In such cases, the company is benefited, the employees receive their share and the CEO gets the credit as well. When everything is in equilibrium in the organization, everyone is happy to receive one’s own share of goodies. CEO is a position, which should be given to a respectable, responsible, and experienced person. No board of directors wishes to experience CEO turnover.

Imagine the time board will take to decide if the CEO is not working for the good of the organization, they shall take another three to six months to find a new person for the job and the new CEO might take another year to understand the working of the organization properly. In the best-case scenario, you must help the poorly performing CEO to do well in the future rather than chucking him out and hire a new one. It will be a pain in the neck for sure.

The board evaluation of a CEO

The board of directors is not directly involved in the micro-management of the organization but this doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be involved at all. They need to have their own genuine ways to evaluate their CEO. After all, the board should also play a role in making the organization capable of achieving things. Besides, the role of a CEO in the organization is so complex that it is easy to think that they are working well but in reality, they are not.

The boards have a duty and they should ensure that the company running well. If they see the problems looming around, it is better to tackle them sooner or later. Missing out on the top management’s problems can create intensive and irreparable damages in the organization. When the CEO fails, the company fails as well. There is no question of what is at stake, the board members should better find out a way to evaluate the CEO and boost the performance rather than firing him and putting someone else in their places.

The financial incentives are not always something that attracts the CEOs, there may be something else troubling the person. The board members should talk to the person in cohesion and find out what he wants. A CEO evaluation need not be a perfunctory process. It is the board’s responsibility to devise a method to evaluate the performance of the CEO. It should be identified as a key management attribute to demonstrate what the CEO does to help the company progress.

For the best board self-evaluation or CEO evaluation for your company, reach out to us.

Brody Lukas is the author of this website and writes articles for a long time. To know more about CEO evaluation and board self-evaluation please visit the website.

Business Name: Governance Coach

Address: Head Office: Calgary, AB

Phone: 403.720.6282

collect
0
avatar
Brody Lukas
guide
Zupyak is the world’s largest content marketing community, with over 400 000 members and 3 million articles. Explore and get your content discovered.
Read more