logo
logo
Sign in

IMS Retrofit vs. IMS Solution: A Guide to Making the Right Choice of Porsche Intermediate Shaft Bearing Replacement

avatar
LN Engineering LLC

When it comes to addressing the IMS bearing issue, owners of affected Porsche models are typically faced with two options: an IMS Retrofit or an IMS Solution. Both approaches aim to prevent bearing failure and extend the engine's lifespan, but they differ in terms of methodology, cost, and longevity.



Understanding the IMS Issue in Porsche Boxster and 911 (996 Models)


The Porsche intermediate shaft (IMS) bearing issue is a well-documented problem affecting Porsche Boxster and 911 models, particularly those produced between the late 1990s and mid-2000s. This issue stems from the failure of the ball bearing used in the intermediate shaft, which plays a crucial role in synchronizing the engine's timing mechanisms. Failure of this bearing can lead to catastrophic engine failure, often necessitating a complete engine rebuild or replacement. The problem is attributed to several factors, including inadequate lubrication, bearing capacity, lack of a factory recommended service interval, and the stress exerted on the bearing by the engine's operation.


IMS Retrofit vs. IMS Solution: A Guide to Making the Right Choice


Replacing the intermediate shaft bearing in your Porsche is a critical part of preventative maintenance, but which IMS bearing replacement should you use?



IMS Retrofit


The IMS Retrofit is a replacement of the original factory bearing with an improved design that is intended to last longer and offer better performance. The retrofit process involves removing the transmission to access the IMS bearing, then replacing the old bearing with the new one. There are several types of retrofit bearings available, including single-row, dual-row, ceramic hybrid, and cylindrical roller bearings each offering different levels of durability and performance.


Pros:

  • Enhanced Reliability: Retrofit bearings are designed to be more durable than the original factory bearings, offering a longer service life.
  • Cost-Effective: Compared to a full IMS Solution, an IMS Retrofit is generally less expensive and can be a cost-effective way to mitigate the risk of IMS bearing failure.
  • Variety of Options: Owners can choose from different types of IMS Retrofit bearings based on their budget and performance requirements.


Cons:

  • Not a Permanent Solution: While IMS Retrofit bearings are an improvement, they will require replacement in the future, depending on driving conditions and mileage. Same goes for any ball or cylindrical roller intermediate shaft bearing replacement.
  • Installation Complexity: The process requires significant disassembly, including transmission removal, which can be costly and time-consuming. If you are planning on keeping your Porsche long-term, the added labor costs associated with having to later replace the IMS Retrofit or any replacement ball or roller bearing again makes using the IMS Solution a much better option.



IMS Solution


The IMS Solution is a more permanent fix that completely eliminates the factory bearing in favor of a new design that does not rely on ball bearings. This solution typically involves replacing the IMS bearing with an oil-fed plain bearing, which essentially eliminates the changes of suffering a future intermediate shaft bearing failure. The IMS Solution is designed to last the lifetime of the engine, addressing the root cause of the IMS bearing issue by removing the reliance on problematic ball or roller bearings.


Pros:

  • Permanent Fix: The IMS Solution is intended to be a once-and-for-all fix, eliminating the need for future replacements.
  • Increased Durability: By replacing the ball bearing with a plain bearing, the IMS Solution significantly reduces the risk of engine failure.
  • Peace of Mind: For owners looking for the most robust solution to the IMS issue, this option offers greater reassurance over the long term.


Cons:

  • Higher Cost: The IMS Solution is generally more expensive than an IMS Retrofit
  • Installation Requirements: Like the IMS Retrofit, the IMS Solution requires significant disassembly, making the installation process labor-intensive and costly.


Conclusion


Choosing between an IMS Retrofit and an IMS Solution depends on several factors, including the owner's budget, the intended use of the vehicle, and the level of risk they are willing to accept. For those seeking a cost-effective way to reduce the risk of IMS bearing failure, an IMS Retrofit may be the appropriate choice. However, for owners who desire the most comprehensive solution and are willing to invest in long-term reliability, the IMS Solution offers a permanent fix to the Porsche IMS bearing issue. Regardless of the choice, addressing the IMS bearing issue is crucial for extending the life of Porsche Boxster and 911 (996 models) and ensuring their continued enjoyment on the road.

collect
0
avatar
LN Engineering LLC
guide
Zupyak is the world’s largest content marketing community, with over 400 000 members and 3 million articles. Explore and get your content discovered.
Read more