Twitter has marked a tweet from President Trump in which he questioned the mail drop boxes use for the November election.
Twitter applied a name to the Sunday morning tweet that reads that this Tweet violated the Twitter Rules about the city and election integrity.
Nonetheless, Twitter has confirmed that it might be the publicās interest in the Tweet to stay available.
The president guaranteed that without referring evidence, that the boxes made it workable for an individual to vote on various occasions and are a voter security disaster that is not COVID sanitized.A ālearn moreā link goes to Twitterās rules about public-interest exceptions.
Through a mail, a Twitter spokesperson said that they set an open intrigue interstitial on this Tweet for abusing their Civic Integrity Policy, for making deluding wellbeing claims that might deter individuals from support in voting.
He added that theyāve made a move given the Tweet violates Rules, however, have kept the Tweet on Twitter since it is significant that the open despite everything have the option to see the Tweet given its pertinence to continuous issues of open importance.Commitment with the tweet will be restricted, the representative included that As is standard with this notification, engagements with the Tweet will be constrained.
Jharkhand election results: Unfortunate for BJP in continuing the 2ndĀ turn of chief minister in Jharkhand assembly elections, but one learns from their own shortcomings.
The results declared in the 2019 Jharkhand Assembly election on Monday again made it clear that the state Chief Minister`s post is still āunfortunateā with none of its holders managing to get a second consecutive term even as current Raghubar Das was trailing in his own stronghold because of which BJP was swept out of the power.However, Das should be applauded for earning the distinction of becoming the first Chief Minister of the tribal-state, engraved out of Bihar in 2000, to complete a full term in power, but in 2019, anti-incumbency, rural distress, resentment over lack of jobs and even a divide within over the choice of poll candidates had to bear the loss.https://www.flypped.com/jharkhand-election-results/news/
The cases rejected by the justices include the election challenges filed by former President Donald Trump and his allies in 5 states President Joe Biden won: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
However, some of the justices had strong feelings about the courtās decision not to hear 2 cases from Pennsylvania that had been particularly contentious in the battleground state.
The cases involved an appeal of a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision requiring election officials to receive and count mailed-in ballots, that arrived up to three days after the election.Point to be noted that 3 of the 9 justices said they would have heard the case, which would not have affected the electionās outcome.
Justice Clarence Thomas called the cases an ideal opportunity to address an important question whether state lawmakers or state courts get the last word about the manner in which federal elections are carried out.
By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidenceā.Thomas cited the expansion of mail-in voting as another reason to take the case.
It is noteworthy that Pennsylvania lawmakers made changes to the stateās election laws in response to the pandemic but left in place a 3rdĀ November deadline to receive absentee ballots.
Twitter has marked a tweet from President Trump in which he questioned the mail drop boxes use for the November election.
Twitter applied a name to the Sunday morning tweet that reads that this Tweet violated the Twitter Rules about the city and election integrity.
Nonetheless, Twitter has confirmed that it might be the publicās interest in the Tweet to stay available.
The president guaranteed that without referring evidence, that the boxes made it workable for an individual to vote on various occasions and are a voter security disaster that is not COVID sanitized.A ālearn moreā link goes to Twitterās rules about public-interest exceptions.
Through a mail, a Twitter spokesperson said that they set an open intrigue interstitial on this Tweet for abusing their Civic Integrity Policy, for making deluding wellbeing claims that might deter individuals from support in voting.
He added that theyāve made a move given the Tweet violates Rules, however, have kept the Tweet on Twitter since it is significant that the open despite everything have the option to see the Tweet given its pertinence to continuous issues of open importance.Commitment with the tweet will be restricted, the representative included that As is standard with this notification, engagements with the Tweet will be constrained.
Jharkhand election results: Unfortunate for BJP in continuing the 2ndĀ turn of chief minister in Jharkhand assembly elections, but one learns from their own shortcomings.
The results declared in the 2019 Jharkhand Assembly election on Monday again made it clear that the state Chief Minister`s post is still āunfortunateā with none of its holders managing to get a second consecutive term even as current Raghubar Das was trailing in his own stronghold because of which BJP was swept out of the power.However, Das should be applauded for earning the distinction of becoming the first Chief Minister of the tribal-state, engraved out of Bihar in 2000, to complete a full term in power, but in 2019, anti-incumbency, rural distress, resentment over lack of jobs and even a divide within over the choice of poll candidates had to bear the loss.https://www.flypped.com/jharkhand-election-results/news/
The cases rejected by the justices include the election challenges filed by former President Donald Trump and his allies in 5 states President Joe Biden won: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
However, some of the justices had strong feelings about the courtās decision not to hear 2 cases from Pennsylvania that had been particularly contentious in the battleground state.
The cases involved an appeal of a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision requiring election officials to receive and count mailed-in ballots, that arrived up to three days after the election.Point to be noted that 3 of the 9 justices said they would have heard the case, which would not have affected the electionās outcome.
Justice Clarence Thomas called the cases an ideal opportunity to address an important question whether state lawmakers or state courts get the last word about the manner in which federal elections are carried out.
By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidenceā.Thomas cited the expansion of mail-in voting as another reason to take the case.
It is noteworthy that Pennsylvania lawmakers made changes to the stateās election laws in response to the pandemic but left in place a 3rdĀ November deadline to receive absentee ballots.